> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://handbook.harmonic.security/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://handbook.harmonic.security/reference.md).

# Reference

- [Governance & Frameworks](https://handbook.harmonic.security/reference/governance-and-frameworks.md): Frameworks, regulations, and program-level guidance for enterprise AI security - covering NIST AI RMF, NIST CSF 2.0, EU AI Act, DORA, ISO 42001, acceptable use policy, and ownership models.
- [G.1 Map your controls to NIST AI RMF and CSF 2.0](https://handbook.harmonic.security/reference/governance-and-frameworks/g.1-map-your-controls-to-nist-ai-rmf-and-csf-2.0.md): The backbone mapping every AI security control family to NIST AI RMF GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, and MANAGE and NIST CSF 2.0 functions.
- [G.2 EU AI Act obligations for deployers](https://handbook.harmonic.security/reference/governance-and-frameworks/g.2-eu-ai-act-obligations-for-deployers.md): EU AI Act obligations for enterprise deployers, including classification, human oversight, monitoring, logging, transparency, and evidence.
- [G.3 DORA and AI resilience in financial services](https://handbook.harmonic.security/reference/governance-and-frameworks/g.3-dora-and-ai-resilience-in-financial-services.md): ICT risk management, third-party risk, operational resilience testing, and incident reporting applied to AI vendors, agents, and model-hosting platforms under DORA.
- [G.4 Colorado AI Act and the US state patchwork](https://handbook.harmonic.security/reference/governance-and-frameworks/g.4-colorado-ai-act-and-the-us-state-patchwork.md): Colorado’s 2026 ADMT law, consequential-decision disclosures, consumer rights, and the emerging multi-state AI regulation picture.
- [G.5 SANS Critical AI Security Guidelines mapping](https://handbook.harmonic.security/reference/governance-and-frameworks/g.5-sans-critical-ai-security-guidelines-mapping.md): How the handbook controls map to the SANS Critical AI Security Guidelines for a practitioner-first cross-check.
- [G.6 Write an AI Acceptable Use Policy that holds up](https://handbook.harmonic.security/reference/governance-and-frameworks/g.6-write-an-ai-acceptable-use-policy-that-holds-up.md): A reusable AUP template covering approved tools, data classes, personal accounts, connectors, agents, coding tools, mobile apps, and incident duties.
- [G.7 Ownership and RACI for AI security](https://handbook.harmonic.security/reference/governance-and-frameworks/g.7-ownership-and-raci-for-ai-security.md): Names the owners across workspace admin, platform admin, security policy, endpoint, compliance, legal, privacy, procurement, and incident response.
- [G.8 ISO/IEC 42001 AI management system](https://handbook.harmonic.security/reference/governance-and-frameworks/g.8-iso-iec-42001-ai-management-system.md): How the handbook supports an AI management system certification effort with clause mapping, control ownership, and evidence artifacts.
- [G.9 HIPAA controls for AI systems handling PHI](https://handbook.harmonic.security/reference/governance-and-frameworks/g.9-hipaa-controls-for-ai-systems-handling-phi.md): HIPAA security and privacy controls for AI systems handling PHI, including BAAs, access, data flows, de-identification, evidence, and incident response.


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter:

```
GET https://handbook.harmonic.security/reference.md?ask=<question>&goal=<endgoal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.